' +
'
1r6p5f
Key Points: 504t2a
The Whitney Museum suspends its prestigious Independent Study Program (ISP) for 2025–2026.
Controversy centers on the museum’s cancellation of a pro-Palestinian performance.
Over 360 alumni and scholars signed an open letter condemning the decision as censorship.
The museum cites a leadership transition and strategic reassessment as reasons for the pause.
Protests erupted in the museum, accusing it of silencing dissent and aligning with oppressive systems.
Whitney Museum Halts Celebrated Study Program Amid Censorship Uproar 1y2h3w
A Program Paused, A Protest Ignited: Whitney Faces Heat Over Gaza Performance Ban
The Whitney Museum of American Art has announced a one-year suspension of its revered Independent Study Program (ISP), drawing sharp criticism and renewed debates about institutional censorship. This unexpected move follows the museum’s controversial decision to cancel a performance addressing the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza—an act widely condemned as an infringement on artistic freedom.
In a statement released on June 2, Whitney director Scott Rothkopf cited the 2023 retirement of longtime ISP head Ron Clark as a driving force behind the decision, noting the program's struggle to maintain continuity and leadership. But while the official explanation focuses on internal restructuring, many believe the true catalyst was external pressure linked to politically charged content.
The canceled performance, titled No Aesthetics Outside My Freedom: Mourning, Militancy and Performance, created by artists Fadl Fakhouri, Noel Maghathe, and Fargo Tbakhi, was meant to serve as the cohort’s capstone event. The museum claimed it violated institutional policy by being “exclusionary and inflammatory.” The response was immediate—and loud.
Voices of Protest 655k5b
Over 360 artists, scholars, and cultural figures signed an open letter denouncing the cancellation and expressing full for the ISP cohort whose work was censored. The letter accuses the museum of “institutional coercion” and abandoning its foundational values in the face of political discomfort. Among the signatories are luminaries such as Judith Butler, Andrea Fraser, Walid Raad, Alfredo Jaar, and Dread Scott.
Their message? “The Whitney cannot claim to be a space for critical thought if it silences voices challenging genocide.”
A Legacy in Question 6h6e58
Founded in 1968, the ISP is known for its bold, interdisciplinary approach to contemporary art, curating, and theory. Now housed in Roy Lichtenstein’s former studio in Manhattan’s West Village, it has long been a breeding ground for some of the art world’s most influential minds.
The museum insists this is a “pause”—not a cancellation—and that it remains committed to the program’s long-term future. But critics worry that the suspension may be a veiled attempt to sidestep uncomfortable political discourse.
Meanwhile, protests have spilled into the museum itself. During a free-ission Friday, demonstrators occupied the lobby, calling out the museum’s ties to board allegedly connected to “genocide, militarism, and apartheid.”
FAQ – What You Need to Know 42g34
📌 Why is the Whitney suspending the ISP?
The museum claims the suspension is due to a leadership gap following the retirement of Ron Clark, who led the program for over five decades.
📌 What performance was canceled, and why?
The piece No Aesthetics Outside My Freedom was canceled for allegedly violating museum policies. Critics argue it was censored for its pro-Palestinian message.
📌 Who’s speaking out?
More than 360 alumni, faculty, and prominent intellectuals—including Judith Butler and Dread Scott—signed a letter denouncing the museum's actions.
📌 Is this the end of the ISP?
No. The museum describes it as a temporary pause and says it plans to relaunch the program with new leadership and vision.
📌 What’s the bigger issue here?
This controversy sits at the intersection of artistic freedom, institutional ability, and geopolitical conflict—raising questions about who gets to speak, and at what cost.
Selena Mattei 
